SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wanna_bmw who wrote (142732)9/4/2001 8:13:26 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
The P4 isn't slow, but it's fat. In the near term, anybody who'd pay $600 for the privilege of running a 2ghz P4, plus being saddled with soon to be obsolete Rambus memory, or else going with Intel's lame SDRAM 845, for a system that's a performance wash with a $105 1.4 ghz Athlon on a $60 mobo is not being economically rational. But economics in the conventional sense isn't what's at work here. If Intel were operating like a conventional company in a competitive marketplace, they'd be thrilled to have Via's DDR P4 chipset out there. That's not the way Intel operates, though.

Of course, Intel is no doubt shoveling the 2ghz P4 into Mikey Dell's hands at a price somewhat below $600, maybe $300, maybe $200.



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (142732)9/4/2001 8:14:37 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE:"Tell that to Kyle over at HardOCP (or any of the dozens of reviewers that had praises to say for Intel's 2.0GHz Pentium 4)."

Who's Kyle? The last word in processors?

Hey, see that big Intel P4-2.0 Ghz banner add on Anands homepage? LOL...I expect unbiased reporting...lol

Jim