SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: thames_sider who wrote (26033)9/5/2001 1:25:29 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 82486
 
. IMO an explanation still does not make an excuse...


I agree with you. I was just trying to give you an "excuse" for getting past your distaste for punishing those who may not be able to help it.

Karen



To: thames_sider who wrote (26033)9/5/2001 1:28:45 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
"IMO an explanation still does not make an excuse..."

Yes it does. Traditionally there are two questions/variables to be considered and which may excuse behavior. 1)Does the actor understand the behavior that is required. 2)Is the actor capable of performing the required behavior.

A four foot tall paraplegic is not capable of competitively stuffing a seven foot tall basketball player so he is not included in NBA competition. A person with an IQ of 30 is not likely to understand the rules and team requirements of professional basketball so he is not likely to be included in NBA competition.

We now have a new set of questions on the requirements of behavior which includes a 3)genetic disposition, or 4)environmental influences.

So if you have a genetic disposition that keeps you from self discipline or if you are raised to see competitive sports as evil you would not be likely to meet the requirements of membership on an NBA basketball team.

This is common sense. However we stopped using common sense with criminal behavior as it relates to membership in society a long time ago.