Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (3175)	9/5/2001 4:58:52 PM
From: LV	Respond to of 23908

If I want to read ravings of a lunatic (like the one you link in your post 3177) I will just read proceedings of Durban conference. I think they collected there all your so-called sources and then some. But I have some questions for you: if the Appellate Court in the US, not a jury which are notorious for coming down with erratic decisions sometimes, but the Appellate Court, found in favor of Sharon in a First Amendment case - and such cases are eminently difficult to prove, don’t you think they considered all the evidence defamatory to Sharon? Why do you think that any other court will come up with a different decision? Is there new evidence that you are hiding somewhere that was not available to the US Appellate Court? Or were the judges bought by the Jews?