Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (12314)	9/6/2001 1:34:05 PM
From: UnBelievable	Respond to of 209892

Nah - I Meant How High Do They Have To Take It So a lot of people get back in before they take it down to test the lows.

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (12314)	9/6/2001 1:38:49 PM
From: AllansAlias	Respond to of 209892

Yup. The tick divergence along with dribbling down is a helluva warning for a short. Now we are getting some of what I call "PacMan Up". It is the sort of thing I do not fade. Better odds if you fade quick up (that scares amateurs) rather than this sort of resistance-chomping steady up.

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (12314)	9/6/2001 1:39:39 PM
From: JRI	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

Another way to look at it.....did things get whacky starting in '98 or did it all start in '95 (Mexican bailout)? CW is that LTCM bailout was the start of "the pump"..so those lows should/may hold. Bulls desperately hanging onto that. The facts, however, point more towards, at a minimum, '95 as Bubbleboy's coming out party.... And I'm not even going into "overshoots", which the market always seems to do, be it on the upside or downside....given we just had the biggest upside overshoot in history...this is s'posed to end w/no overshoot on downside? Wow, I think I just talked myself into lower targets than yours- ng