SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (8388)9/7/2001 12:08:44 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
<If making life difficult for other people until you eventually capitulate is your idea of a win, that's rather strange. The landlord won, because the lawyer forced you to pay. You clearly would never had done so otherwise.>

In the lawyer's calculus, they lost. He really didn't want a whole bunch of cases like that.

I play golf all day, which is not as entertaining as that day, so I was in credit the whole way. It cost me nothing at all, other than the rent, which I knew I had to pay anyway. There was no doubt in my mind about that from the beginning.

Win, lose, it's all how you look at it. I was very happy with my outcomes. Really quite delighted. Which is why I recount the story now. They were NOT delighted. They had significant costs. They didn't think it was much of a victory. They did some cleaning up, but it was a running down place so that will have been superficial.

Because we were leaving Ottawa, I didn't have time to continue the fun with the Tenants Association, so that was the end of that for me.

Also, good for you if you can give a thief some well-deserved consequences. But perhaps you should look a little closely and see if there isn't a quid pro quo in the husband wife exchange and a legal "victory" is not in fact the best outcome.

Jeez CB, I'm always rational! All for it. Sweet dreams. [Re previous post]

Mqurice