Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (12465)	9/7/2001 10:45:43 AM
From: JRI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Yeah, and failure here and today will be a disaster for the market, for it'll mean it will take the actual COMPX bottom to stop this thing (short-term)...and if that's the case, it'll be only for a cup of coffee (and a sugar-roll bounce) before more down... Bulls have a real problem at COMPX lows...we break those, and, as the saying goes, "where it stops, nobody knows".. I think this thing is toast (short-term), but a turn here today we'll make me think a respectable bounce is possible, and that the double-bottom COMPX will be harder to break (than expected)

To: AllansAlias who wrote (12465)	9/7/2001 10:48:06 AM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

has cash NDX been as low as 1340 -- what I am showing or is that wrong?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (12465)	9/7/2001 10:56:58 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

Looks like the pop was enough to close the opening gap on the SPX E-Mini, and it promptly sold down from there. P/C's show a good slug of index poot activity, but equities were down around 0.6-0.7 or so. cboe.com

To: AllansAlias who wrote (12465)	9/7/2001 11:45:37 AM
From: Perspective	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

I have us (in the Naz) turning for a double bottom soon; just did b of B of a flat upward correction, now c of B. (we went up in three waves, down in five, so the jello "B" if it is a "B" isn't done yet - we got a little up jello "b" and need a matching impulse "c" to complete a zig-zag "B" correction of this morning's short covering.) This should produce a head-fake underneath the AM low on SPX, but it looks like COMPX should be able to complete a flat without new lows. Longer term is easier to see on SPX; I see us entering C of 4 (which started at the open today) of 3 down (which started at SPX=1155 on Tuesday) of 3 down (which started Aug. 27th) of 3 (or C) down (which started July 31st) of A or 1 down (which started off the May highs). In other words, we should be wrapping up 3 of 3 of the third wave of whatever launched off the May highs in the next several hours. It would make sense to me to have the 5 of 3 of 3 of 3 land us at a COMPX retest,producing a multi day 4 of 3 of 3 rally. I maintain that (from Naz perspective) this remains in the context of what the double zig-zag looked like in 1931 as the second zig-zag launched with vigor. While I didn't count Naz, it has similar structure to SPX; the SPX is just far clearer to read right now. BC