SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (178523)9/7/2001 11:10:25 AM
From: bosquedog  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Quit harping the BS GOP party line. Tax cuts mainly to the rich don't do our economy any good right now
Which tax cuts that are effective in 2001 are you referring to that are mainly for the rich? The tax rate is only reduced 1 % for the old marginal rates 28% to 39.6%. Thus, the new rates will be 27% to 38.6% (effective July 1,2001). We have already discussed the elimination of the estate tax is only effective in 2010 and you must die to obtain that benefit so I can't envision that being the tax cut for the rich you are thinking about.
BTW: Tim Lamb would like you to apologize for calling him a liar.



To: American Spirit who wrote (178523)9/7/2001 11:15:49 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 769667
 
During CLinton there was full employment, sharing and general happiness, unity and prosperity for all, though the right-wing attack dogs could never be happy

LOL!!

Tell it to Billy Dale, the people in Serbia, the owner of the aspirin factory Clinton ordered bombed, the people killed in the Chinese embassy bombing, Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers or any other victims of the criminal enterprise formerly known as the Clinton Administration.....

JLA



To: American Spirit who wrote (178523)9/7/2001 1:23:48 PM
From: Srexley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Man, you are ridiculous.

"show me one example where Bush has given workingclass people something and not picked it back out of their pocket with the other hand"

The government is not in place to GIVE things to people. Why do you think it is?

Also - name one thing he has taken back. How could he take it back if he naever GAVE them anything. He is giving them from $300 to $600 (IF THEY PAID FED TAX). Haven't seen him take it back.