SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan3 who wrote (143095)9/7/2001 1:52:11 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Respond to of 186894
 
Dan, Re: "The mid-term update was less negative than many expected, so why no rally?"

I've seen some analysts say that the surprising jobs data lessened the potential for a rally. You may have a point, too, but I think that most analysts had expected revenue for Intel to be below the midpoint, anyway.

wanna_bmw



To: Dan3 who wrote (143095)9/7/2001 2:01:08 PM
From: Crystal ball  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
I am still buying. INTC at least sees the NEXT BIG THING and that is wireless communication computing chip convergence and that is why they told Rimm Blackberry no to supporting bluetooth and instead favor the PALM OS. That is good enough of an endorsement for me, at these prices I am buying both INTC and PALM.
The trick to making money is buying low and selling higher. See you all at the bank.

Incidentally, can anyone find out about this: Why the MEDIA BLACKOUT? I would like to hear some news on Yankowski and Colin Powell speaking on PALM pda and high tech impact on society at the State Department's all day high tech talks? bigcharts.marketwatch.com
I am,
Truly your$,
-Crystal Ball
Subject 51122

P.S. I almost forgot: the HWP and CPQ merger throws their pda's into total disarray, CPQ's models do not incorporate Intel's standard, even though the HWP models do. But the CPQ models have more marketshare than HWP, but Fiorini's HWP is the survivor of the merger, so goodbye or not, to which pda? Safer bet is PALM it supports the INTC and MOT and TI chip standards around which it is built.



To: Dan3 who wrote (143095)9/7/2001 2:03:53 PM
From: chomolungma  Respond to of 186894
 
AMD gave some pretty clear cut numbers in its update, Intel was very vague.

Of course they did. Because it's generally accepted that AMD is the best managed company in the US today. Just look at the incredible return the shareholders have earned. In fact, I think Jerry Sanders is under consideration to run GE!



To: Dan3 who wrote (143095)9/7/2001 2:17:51 PM
From: fingolfen  Respond to of 186894
 
The mid-term update was less negative than many expected, so why no rally?

Dan, I know a lot of people have accused you of a lot of things on this board... but there is one trait I feel you exhibit which I think an honest criticism: tunnel vision. Day to day movement of Intel stock frequently has little to do with direct news from Intel... much less AMD... regardless of your emotional ties. Look at the market as a whole today... it's in the tank! Why? Unemployment numbers didn't look good, so Mr. Market got a case of the vapors. Earlier in the day Intel was in positive territory (as was AMD), so there was a brief rally on the news, but prevailing economic news squashed it. Look at the big picture rather than taking an obvious opportunity to throw in a few cheap shots...