SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ed Forrest who wrote (55085)9/7/2001 4:57:25 PM
From: SouthFloridaGuy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 77397
 
Let's see how low CSCO goes when people begin to dump it for tax-loss.



To: Ed Forrest who wrote (55085)9/8/2001 12:26:03 AM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77397
 
Hehe. They're baaack...



To: Ed Forrest who wrote (55085)9/8/2001 1:23:52 AM
From: Stock Farmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 77397
 
... TMs... Yesterday I counted 7 confirmed veterans and several more strong rookie candidates

Let me get this straight. The veterans are the ones you thought were morons for suggesting it would plunge when it was near $70, right?

I guess that makes TM = "Told you so Ed, you Moron"... ROFL

And you are challenging someone else's credibility? I like your sense of humor.

John



To: Ed Forrest who wrote (55085)9/8/2001 9:01:59 AM
From: SouthFloridaGuy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77397
 
<LOL,the lower Cisco goes the more the TMs reappear>

I love how you say it so smugly...as if you holding CSCO from 80 to 14 makes you a genius.



To: Ed Forrest who wrote (55085)9/27/2001 10:51:29 AM
From: bambs  Respond to of 77397
 
the lower csco goes...the more TM's disappear. or change handles.

single digits soon...

boy Ed, could you have been more wrong about csco?

bambs