SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rich4eagle who wrote (178745)9/7/2001 11:31:36 PM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Medical break...........The Right Fat for a Healthy Prostate


Heather Salomon Zeitz, RD, CDN





Related Webcasts
Fat Facts
Screening for Prostate Cancer: What Every Man Should Know

"I'll have the fish please. Extra oily." This may be the order of the day for men concerned about prostate cancer. Research suggests that eating moderate amounts of oily fish might cut the risk of prostate cancer in half.
A study published in The Lancet medical journal found that Swedish men who ate greasy fish only occasionally, or not at all, were twice as likely to develop prostate cancer as those men who ate greasy fish in moderate amounts or frequently

But are there other bad dietary patterns that are common accompaniments to a non-fish eater's diet? Below, registered dietician, Ms. Heather Salomon, gives us the skinny on fat and its relationship to cancer.

Introduction
In general, Americans consume approximately forty percent of total calories from fat, whereas fat intake in China and Japan is considerably lower, at ten to twenty percent. The Asian diet is characteristically rich in fish and plant-based foods such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and soy foods, while the typical Western diet consists of significantly more processed, or "convenience" foods, and animal products. Evidence overwhelmingly suggests that it is healthier to have a diet low in fat (particularly saturated or animal fat), and high in fruits, vegetables, fiber, and soy protein.

The skinny on fat
Fat has been studied more thoroughly and linked more frequently to cancer than any other factor in our diets. Studies of the vast cultural differences in diet first identified total fat intake as a factor directly associated with the incidence of prostate cancer. The incidence of prostate cancer in the United States has increased significantly in the 20th century, right along with the increased intake of red meat and hidden fats in oils, margarine, butter, and processed baked goods.

Saturated fats
While the evidence does support a diet that is on the whole low in fat-as low as ten to twenty percent total calories from fat-more recent research suggests that the type of fat you consume can also make a difference. Several studies have found a direct association between saturated fat intake from meat and dairy products and prostate cancers. Saturated fats are animal in origin, such as fatty meats (i.e., beef, veal, pork, lamb), whole-milk dairy products, and butter. Even leaner animal products such as chicken or turkey can serve up a lot of saturated fat if you are choosing pieces with skin or dark meat.

Unsaturated fats
Unsaturated fats are derived mainly from plants and fish. The two types of unsaturated fats include monounsaturated fats (fats from olive oil, canola oil, avocados, and peanuts) and polyunsaturated fats (omega-6 fatty acids from vegetable oils like corn and safflower oil, omega-3 fatty acids from fish and flax seeds). While all types of unsaturated fats have been shown to help cardiovascular health by lowering levels of LDL ("bad" cholesterol in the blood), laboratory tests have suggested that trying to increase omega-3 fatty acids while decreasing sources of omega-6 fatty acids can help control stimulation of tumor growth in prostate cancer.

Trans-fatty acids
Trans-fatty acids are unsaturated fats that have been chemically modified to become saturated and seem to carry the same risks as saturated fats where cancer and heart disease are concerned. These fats are found mostly in margarine and processed snacks or baked goods, which list "partially hydrogenated oil" as one of the first ingredients on the food label. Overall, in the fight against prostate cancer, your goal should be to lower the total fat in your diet-specifically saturated fats, omega-6 fatty-acids and trans-fats-while incorporating some omega-3 fatty acids for their potential protective effects.

Lowering fat intake is easier than you think
Here are some tips for lowering your fat intake:

Eliminate fried foods.
Use low-fat cooking methods. Use cooking spray or a nonstick pan instead of oil. Grill, broil, roast, or poach fish and poultry. Trim all visible fat before cooking.
Choose only low-fat or fat-free dairy products. A low-fat product means there is no more than 3g of fat per serving and a "fat- free" product has no more than ½ gram of fat per serving.
Eliminate fatty meats (i.e., hot dogs, marbled meats, dark meat poultry). Try to limit consumption of red meat to no more than once per week or once per month-or avoid these meats altogether.
Eliminate fatty foods (i.e., cream sauces, poultry skin, cream soups, nuts, chocolates, gravies). Choose tomato-based sauces and soups instead of cream varieties.
Conclusion
Remember, reducing fat is only one part of a good cancer preventive diet, but it's a good starting place. The best thing to do is set small goals for yourself. You may want to concentrate on the fat in your diet first and once you've reached that goal, start adding some fruits and vegetables. Each food that you add or eliminate is yet another success in using your diet to fight prostate cancer.



To: rich4eagle who wrote (178745)9/8/2001 11:46:31 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 769670
 
I would explain to you why are wrong richie but I can't talk down that far on the IQ scale...

JLA



To: rich4eagle who wrote (178745)9/8/2001 11:49:16 AM
From: Jagfan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Yeah, blame the Nasdaq fall on Bush. Typical demolib

It's Time to Investigate Those Who Inflated the Bubble

By Ben Stein
Special to TheStreet.com
09/05/2001 11:46 AM EDT

"I sit in one of the dives
On Fifty-Second Street
Uncertain and afraid
As the clever hopes expire
Of a low dishonest decade:
Waves of anger and fear
Circulate over the bright
And darkened lands of the earth..."
These great lines are from the poem, September 1, 1939, by W. H. Auden -- his ruminations as World War II began with the Nazi invasion of Poland.

I came upon them totally by chance as I was taking time from studying the stock and bond markets. They are in a must-have compendium called The Faber Book of English History in Verse, edited by Kenneth Baker. Although the words refer to another time, they apply with blazing ferocity to the stock market crash on the Nasdaq and the charlatanism that led up to it. Not so much "a low dishonest decade," but a very, very low dishonest 1998, 1999 and early 2000.



Clearly, the worst stock market debacle in the history of postwar America did not just happen by chance or by the greed of the masses, but it happened in large part because of conspiracy, incredible ignorance and greed in high places, and a federal regulatory failure of unique proportions.

Let's start with the ignorance and the greed, a combustible mixture. The stock market is supposed to be a way of buying the earnings of America's public companies. Thus, stocks with no earnings -- and no prospects of earnings -- should either not be on the exchange at all, or be shunned as unclean.

Instead, completely worthless companies that existed as no more than dreams and fantasies were brought to market and touted as multi-billion-dollar entities by people and investment houses whose job was to defend against exactly such viruses. This sucked in multitudes of little guys, making the bubble look like a sure thing, and then even cautious people came into the market.

Among the worst offenders were the managers of mutual funds. Supposed to look for value and intrinsic merit, enjoined by law and custom to be prudent with their investors' funds, they instead joined wildly in the raillery, got their own rewards for buying the garbage and then ran ads about their great success to suck in still more money from the unwary.

None of this happened by accident. Some people got fantastically rich from the fraud, and people do not usually get rich from fraud by accident.

At the same time, the insiders were also amazingly ignorant of the ways of markets and of simple laws of gravity. When I appeared on many panels with Wall Street movers and shakers in the past five years, I was appalled at what they did not know, and far worse, at what they thought they knew that was not so. They really thought an Internet portal like Yahoo! (YHOO:Nasdaq - news - commentary) should be priced at thousands of times earnings -- even as it was being pushed into obscurity by AOL (AOL:NYSE - news - commentary). They really thought that AT&T (T:NYSE - news - commentary) did not sell itself into oblivion by buying cable systems at three or four times their value with the pipe dream of using them for local telephony -- even as the whole business became a commodity enterprise.

Powerful Wall Street players really did believe that there was a "new paradigm" in which earnings would grow 10 times as fast as national income forever. They not only did not know history, they did not know simple arithmetic. And they pretended that they knew more than the old hands, when they knew less.

Warren Buffett said a few years ago that he would like to give a business school exam asking students to value an Internet company. Anyone who gave an answer other than "I don't know" would fail.

Most of the people one saw daily on CNBC touting worthless Internet junk would have failed miserably -- and did. They took the little guy's money with them ... but the Wall Street players are still rich, and some got rich exactly from touting garbage, from stock options, cheap stock, or other conflict of interest payments.

While all this was happening, where was the Securities and Exchange Commission? The SEC, with unequivocal broad oversight powers over brokers and investment bankers to stop any scheme or artifice to defraud, to supervise illegal payoffs and bar them, to make sure all lawful disclosures are made, slept soundly.

There is much that bears SEC scrutiny: failure to disclose improper connections between issuers and investment banks, failure to disclose payments to analysts, failure to disclose specific as opposed to boilerplate risks, routine placement of the interests of the fiduciary -- the bank or broker -- ahead of the interests of the customer.

Where is Congress? Where are any friends of the little guy? Where is Congressman John Dingell? Where is Congressman Billy Tauzin? Where is Congressman Edward Markey?

One thing we did learn that was positive: The ordinary investor, by reading and studying and applying basic rules of common sense, can tremendously outperform the "geniuses" of the mutual funds. (My sainted parents were all in blue-chips and bonds and just laughed at the bubble. Their son was not as smart.)

The Pecora Commission was set up to study wrongdoing that led to the Crash of 1929-33. Why not another one right now? Why not one to write a book about how this debacle happened, with subpoena power over witnesses?

What happened did not happen by accident, and a full accounting is owed those who were fleeced.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------