SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles Tutt who wrote (178775)9/8/2001 12:35:03 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
LOL!! Someone should have told James (serpenthead) Carvile..... JLA



To: Charles Tutt who wrote (178775)9/8/2001 1:29:35 PM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 769670
 
That's true because "hate speech" is a perverse anti-constitutional invention of the left.

Hate speech is the domain of the right wing.



To: Charles Tutt who wrote (178775)9/8/2001 2:25:43 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Bush's obvious ploy to trick Mexican-American voters.
It's SO obvious it's almost pathetic. Sure he has a relationship with Mexico. Fox is a big ex Coca COla exectuive and Mexico itself is partly a big energy company. So they're buds. This is his only foreign policy experience. I believe the Bush idea to give 2 million illegals citizenship is a ploy. He knows it will never pass so he is safe in suggesting it, hoping to cut into that fast-growing voter block and make himself look sympathetic to the working poor even when his policies nix the poor. Trouble is this and every other thing Bush is pushing now just smacks of another self-serving ploy. What does this have to do with solving our economic problems? Maybe it helps some big ranchers and growers along the border but it will not do squat otherwise. What has he done on the economy? Besides the tax cuts which now have to be pared way-way down, Bush has done absolutely nothing of a positive nature for the economy and it's even doubtful whether the tax cut will have any beneficial effect. It might even have a net negative effect, although it's simply a transfer of money from government to people, primarily rich people, so hopefully they spend it. Much better however would be to have a sound fiscally conservative economic policy which helps troubled sectors the most, is forward-looking and doesn't drive us back into Reagan sized debt.