SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (15890)9/8/2001 8:01:57 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 59480
 
Laz, I think that diversity has always been a factor in admissions. Schools might give a little extra consideration to, say, someone who had lived overseas his whole life as the child of foreign service officers or missionaries, or a normally able youngster whose parents were both deaf or little people, or who was a trumpet virtuoso, or had been a child movie star. I think that's a great idea for students to be exposed to people who have unusual and interesting backgrounds.

It was only when the term, diversity, was co-opted by the groupists that it became a problem. Diversity on an individual level is something I consider desirable in reasonable doses. I think we should applaud this decision and the schools that are already practicing it.

Karen



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (15890)9/11/2001 12:31:23 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 59480
 
Diversity gives an educational rationale to the drive to affirmative action, in a situation where it is difficult say that there is invidious discrimination being practiced. If all qualified black applicants are admitted (or hispanic or whatever), than how does one rationalize admitting more, that is, those with dubious qualifications? Hey, presto, diversity!