SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (26642)9/9/2001 2:09:05 PM
From: Mark Johnson  Respond to of 30051
 
<< It is funny how now everyone is complaining I am not bearish enough, while the same number (1600) when we were above 2200 was considered a lunacy>>>

LOL Zeev....now you're rubbing your lapdog noses in Zeevie do do....You and every other bearish analyst suspected a retest of the 4/4/01 low...so what...now someone needs to rub your nose in the do do.....



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (26642)9/9/2001 2:45:21 PM
From: orkrious  Respond to of 30051
 
. It is funny how now everyone is complaining I am not bearish enough,

Not me. I'm trying to put to work my investment account. Now down to 70% cash. The truth is, it is tough buying at the bottom. I want the most bang for the buck, with limited downside. <G> There is a lot out there that still isn't "cheap."

Jay



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (26642)9/10/2001 6:42:11 PM
From: m1o2n3i4c5k6  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Z-man, does Friday and today's Nas activity constitute a move close enough to 1600 to qualify for the beginning of the 300 point temporary reversal the turnips suggested last week? Thanks in advance. Welcome back.