Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Guidance and Visibility -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (15100)	9/9/2001 3:23:05 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 208838

Hey Zeev , check out this call : Message 15892761 if he's 3 for 3 .... hehe

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (15100)	9/9/2001 3:35:21 PM
From: DebtBomb	Respond to of 208838

Hi Zeev, I don't how you could find exactly how they would be accounted for in and out of the Nasdaq, but if one takes a look at the Nasdaq A/D line and compares it to the Nasdaq index since 98, it's been the Nasdaq IPO's and a very select few Nasdaq tech stocks, Semi's and Bio's mostly, that took the Nasdaq up to the bubble top, but IPO's surely helped create the bubble, IMO. The Nasdaq A/D line has been dropping since 98. Many will ask, how can that be, the Nasdaq went to 5100?? Easy, all they did was just keep pumping out ridiculously over-inflated market cap IPO's to the public, and it helped the Nasdaq index go up. Take LNUX for example, at it's peak, it sported a market cap of almost 13 billion dollars. And that's just just one little IPO. The A/D line was a clue, it was a bubble. Pretty cool huh?? Most Nasdaq stocks kept going down the whole time the bubble was building. What's bad now is, many of those IPO shares are history, and the A/D line keeps on dropping.