Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 1king who wrote (11218)	9/9/2001 11:05:33 PM
From: main_vein	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11676

Agreed that high velocity keeps sulphides suspended in the melt but it also allows the magma to scavenge Fe + S from the country gneisses, ... sooner or later, fast flowing magma has to slow down and allow the sulphides to precipitate, ... maybe somewhere nearby even. So, ... not sure of your point that flow breccias are not good. New orebodies are sometimes even discovered in old mines (Goldcorp for example). Did the Lab guys completely eliminate the potential of the Central Gabbro in that short program? Hmmm. My bet is that Falco has already established a base camp. If so, the SHORT fall program may have already begun. As the holder of a lot of DML paper, I am delighted to admit that I was dead wrong on that. <ggg>. Do you think the N-C suture is NOT present at SVB Kingslie? How "well constrained" does it have to be for you to believe that its at least present in some form? Sheesh man, you're the one whose in the exploration business, ... EXPLORE for cripe's sakes! Falco thinks that SVB's a good bet, ... and holy crap man, ... they didn't even ask YOU if you thought the suture was "well constrained" enough there! CALL BACK THE CHOPPERS!! KING IS NOT SURE THAT THE NAIN-CHURCHILL BOUNDARY IS "WELL CONSTRAINED" AT SVB!!! Your point on the Nain-Churchill boundary is the best example verbal diarrhea yet! "Losing the meaning of words lost deep" in any postings is not conducive with passing intelligent comment on them. Better to not spew at all perhaps?