SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (15920)9/10/2001 10:09:42 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480
 
Interviews are too judgemental...no matter what people think. The first 93% of an impression of someone is non verbal.....and the rest of the time is spent justifing that first impression.

I've actually helped go over scholarship apps with the requirements described, and you would be surprised how candid and refreshing they are....

This method has produced wonderful candidates, and who cares what race, creed, color or financial background has to do with anything...Obviously, all of that certainly
doesn't have to count. It simply doesn't matter.



To: Lane3 who wrote (15920)9/10/2001 11:44:41 AM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 59480
 
Anybody who can memorize an essay and spew it out in good form probably deserves to be in college anyhow.

Any admissions process is potentially flawed. Any system can be worked by those with money. I think that proposal came closer to finding a student's true capabilities than most would, though it should be only one part of the process -- it rewards verbal thinkers, but punishes non-verbal thinkers. So probably there should be a variety of on-the-spot processes to test for various desirable attributes.

But the fact that some students can "work" a system doesn't make it necessarily invalid. You can't avoid that totally (even the McDonald's game was rigged). The best you can do is reduce the opportunities for manipulation. Which are rife in the present system.

Or don't you think so?



To: Lane3 who wrote (15920)9/10/2001 11:46:34 AM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 59480
 
Another thought:

If the essay topic were assigned at the time of the writing and not before it would be very hard to have a professionally prepared one ready. Or those would become very obvious.

You could even have just a simple list of 100 words of which 90 needed to be included in the essay. It would be pretty hard to pre-write an essay then.

There are ways to reduce the potential for cheating. Not eliminate. But reduce.