Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jjayxxxx who wrote (54387)	9/10/2001 5:18:00 PM
From: survivin	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

Via on the warpath Infoworld reports Via will file both criminal and civil complaints against intc. Not good. I'm not familiar with Taiwan law, but this could get really ugly and give lay observers a valuable look into the nasty world of marketing, ty-ins/outs, etc. Look for an early settlement in lieu of a public airing of some very dirty laundry. Via hits back with countersuits against Intel By Martyn Williams September 10, 2001 8:43 am PT infoworld.com AFTER FINDING ITSELF on the receiving end of legal action Friday, Taiwan's Via Technologies blasted back at rival Intel Monday, filing lawsuits of its own alleging patent infringement, fair trade law violations, and destruction of Via property. Lawsuits alleging patent infringement by Intel in its Pentium 4 processor and companion 845 chip set were filed in Taipei on Monday and will be filed later in the day on Monday in the United States, said Richard Brown, a spokesman for Via. "Both of them contain intellectual property that is owned by Via and therefore they are infringing our patent and we are seeking legal redress for that infringement," he said. Brown declined to detail the technology or patents that his company alleges are being infringed upon by Intel. "We can't provide full details right now," he said. "On the chip set and CPU there are certain things that we have patented, and when we file to the court officially that information will be revealed." The lawsuits represent a stepping-up of what had been until Friday a battle of words between the two companies. To date, chip sets from Intel for its Pentium 4 processor support only RDRAM (Rambus DRAM); however the company on Monday launched its new chip set, the 845, which supports much cheaper DDR SDRAM (Double Data Rate Synchronous DRAM). Via had previously released its own chip set that supports DDR, the P4X266, however the company has not obtained a license from Intel for the 400MHz bus used with the Pentium 4. The company maintains Intel does not have a patent that covers the bus. The lawsuits filed on Friday by Intel allege Via's P4X266 and upcoming P4M266 chip sets violate five patents associated with Intel's Pentium 4 processor. Brown dismissed those lawsuits. "We don't, as far as we know, infringe on any patents, and now we will vigorously defend the claims in court that Intel is making against us," he said. Via also said it has separately begun litigation against Intel alleging violations of Taiwan's fair trade law and the willful destruction of Via property by Intel representatives and employees. Threats, allegedly made by Intel to computer makers aimed at stopping them from using Via's chip set, are violations of the fair trade law, Brown said. "[Intel has violated the fair trade law] through the threats it has made to its customers and our customers, telling them if they use the Via P4X266 chip set Intel will take certain actions against them. They have threatened legal action against the customers and also other sanctions, such as lack of availability of product. We have clear evidence that is being done," he said. And, perhaps demonstrating the level to which the battle between these companies has sunk, Via is also seeking to prosecute Intel employees for allegedly taking down its posters and balloons at the Computex 2001 trade show that was held in Taipei in June. "It might sound a little bit petty, but it is clear vandalism of our property. If you had a bunch of kids who are pulling down posters or signs from outside shops in shopping malls then that is regarded as vandalism," Brown said. "This is criminal action and therefore we are filing criminal suits against the individuals that were involved or the ones that gave those instructions to destroy Via property." Intel could not immediately be reached for comment.