Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Norm Demers who wrote (179355)	9/11/2001 1:42:14 PM
From: cAPSLOCK	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

We don't have to risk much. Even without ground forces we are VERY mighty. I think that at this time we may gain the majority of world support, which we badly need. Not to justify any action we take, but to stand firm with us in such action. But if we were to use nuclear weapons we would lose support all over the world. Again, this is not important only from a moral aspect, but in sustaining greater world peace in the aftermath of this event. If we are to act idiotically as you suggest we may very well help start the next World War. It may be impossible to avoid anyway. But it will be much easier without angering and endangering so much of the rest of the worlds populace with nuclear weapons. Retalliation is one thing. But me must not act as fools. cAPS