SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41234)9/11/2001 4:22:03 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Not to change topics BUT here is a good article on deflating bubbles --from The Economist...

economist.com

Best Regards,

Scott



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41234)9/11/2001 4:22:33 PM
From: Venkie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
I wish I knew how many died...I am one of those who believes we should do whatever it takes to show these scumbags we won't lay down and take this.An eye for an eye...fuc&&^em...just be sure you hv the right group and unleash hell just like today in NY. It's the only way they will listen.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41234)9/11/2001 11:37:23 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Oooops. A little late...

State Department technology lagging

Attack on WTC may create upgrade pressure

msnbc.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41234)9/12/2001 1:54:36 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Bin Laden denies committing US attacks...

sg.news.yahoo.com

Mr. Ben Laden buddy should be sweating big time by now...IMHO, he should be planning his funeral -- and those close to him and supporting him may suffer grave consequences as well. I predict that the U.S. will strike in a VERY DECISIVE way. We need to go after a lot of these radical terrorist cells -- hunt them down in their backyards and destroy the environments that allow them to train and grow and launch further violent acts. This IS NOT a time to be shy. We must respond in a careful, measured way though.

At the same time we need to ramp up our U.S. airport security, our plane security, our global intelligence gathering activities, and our diplomatic efforts.

Best Regards,

Scott



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41234)9/12/2001 2:23:17 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
10:35pm 09/11/01 Mounting oil risks to U.S. reaction?...

By August Cole

London's Control Risk Group says there could be an adverse reaction by oil producing nations Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Lybia and Saudi Arabia should the U.S. retaliate in response to Tuesday's terrorist attacks, reports Dow Jones. As well, this sort of action might keep oil tankers from sailing to the Middle East, Dow Jones said traders noted. However, OPEC has been clear it will keep up with the supply of oil. Brent crude oil prices in London trading topped $30 a barrel after the attacks in Tuesday trading. Nymex oil futures are expected to hit that level, said Phil Flynn of Alaron.com, when trading does resume. <<

1:07am 09/12/01 DC officals to ask IMF to delay meet--AP By Allen Wan

District of Columbia officials said they may ask the World Bank and International Monetary Fund to postpone their fall meetings in the wake of U.S. terrorist attacks, the Associated Press reported. The Sept. 29-30 meetings are expected to draw tens of thousands of protesters, and intense security in the nation's capital.

Insurance claims to reach billions
Huge losses seen in life, property, workers' comp
By Kristen Gerencher & Mike Tarsala, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 4:12 PM ET Sept. 11, 2001

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) -- The attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon are expected to be the most costly, man-made catastrophe in U.S. history and the insurance industry will struggle to absorb billions in expected losses, experts said Tuesday.

Industry officials said the insurance market's reserves, known as reinsurance, might be unable to pay out the massive claims. The Federal Reserve said it would provide additional money to support relief efforts as needed.

"Clearly, this is the sort of event no one could have anticipated," said Candysse Miller, a spokeswoman from the Insurance Information Institute in Los Angeles.

The World Trade Center's two towers plus two other buildings on site were valued at $3.2 billion this year and the complex could cost an estimated $2.5 billion to $3 billion to construct today, excluding the cost of the land. See full story.

Insurance companies may need temporary federal reinsurance to cover losses, said Robert Hunter, Director of Insurance for Washington-based Consumer Federation of America. But the industry should be able to weather the latest catastrophe, he said.

"Even after Hurricane Andrew, which was $15 billion in reported losses, only eight companies had financial difficulties and all claims were paid," Hunter said. "The industry bounced back."

Munich Re, the world's largest reinsurance company, said it expects considerable damage claims from the terror attacks on New York and Washington, according to the Financial Times.

U.S. property-casualty insurer Chubb (CB: news, chart, profile) said it has "significant property exposure" in the World Trade Center and estimated its pre-tax loss at $100 million to $200 million, subject to revision as more facts become known.

"The company will also pay customers' claims under business interruption, accident and workers' compensation coverages, but it is unable at this time to quantify the potential exposure for these losses," Chubb Chief Executive Dean O'Hare said.

Forthcoming claims for loss of life, property, injuries, workers' compensation and business interruption are certain to surpass the largest, non-natural U.S. disaster to date -- the Los Angeles riots of 1992, which cost $775 million in overall insurance losses.

The 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center brought $510 million in claims, and the Oklahoma City bombing, the most deadly terrorist attack in the U.S. until now, wrought $125 million in claims six years ago.

The U.S. government is self-insured, so physical loss to government buildings like the Pentagon isn't a commercial issue, the insurance institute said.

Property policies typically cover terrorism, but they exclude acts of declared war, Miller said. Still, in light of increased global terrorism, some commercial policies have exclusions for damage caused by terrorist attacks.

There also will be health insurance claims from potentially thousands injured in the buildings' collapse and ensuing workers' compensation claims from those killed or injured on the job.

"It will be enough of a magnitude that it may trigger some disaster planning" within the industry, Hunter said.

Added Miller: "This will throw a whole new set of issues at risk managers."

"An event like (Tuesday's) is going to cause us to rethink a lot of things in this country, whether it's financial markets or airport security," she said. "But how that plays out is anyone's guess."

Kristen Gerencher is a reporter for CBS.MarketWatch.com in San Francisco.
Mike Tarsala is a San Francisco-based reporter for CBS.MarketWatch.com.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41234)9/12/2001 9:47:40 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Greenspan Returning to U.S.

BASEL, Switzerland (AP) - Federal Reserve (news - web sites) Chairman Alan Greenspan (news - web sites) is returning to the United States, a spokeswoman for the Bank for International Settlements said Wednesday.

``He'll be back in the U.S. today,'' said Margaret Critchlow. She declined to elaborate on how he would return. Trans-Atlantic commercial flights have been canceled since Tuesday's terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, leaving a U.S. government flight as a probable option.

Greenspan tried to fly home Tuesday, but his commercial flight turned back to Switzerland after U.S. air space was closed, U.S. officials said.

Greenspan was in Basel to attend a meeting Monday at BIS, known as the ``central bankers' central bank.''

Markets are watching whether the Federal Reserve will need to pump extra money into the U.S. economy to avert a recession.

After the attacks the Fed said it was ready to supply additional money to the banking system as it was after the October 1987 stock market crash, when it was credited with keeping the economy out of recession.