SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (26965)9/11/2001 10:08:19 PM
From: James Calladine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 30051
 
"We are not safe any longer. Peace is no longer an option, if it ever was."

Remember Viet Nam? The above was the justification for
that.

Did it accomplish anything? Other than mass destruction of
all parties?

Even by paying attention to the words themselves, you can
understand that:

YOU CANNOT GET PEACE BY WAGING WAR.....

Today's violence will typically trigger more violence which
will in turn trigger more violence and so on. Then full scale war.

Replacing foreign governments you don't like is more
complicated than you are suggesting. An example: Iraq

You get peace by removing conflict, not generating more.

Namaste!

Jim



To: Bilow who wrote (26965)9/11/2001 10:09:17 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (8) | Respond to of 30051
 
Careful, Carl, if we act too "loosely", I fear we may get what Nosterdamus was predicting for the early part of this millennium, a huge "Christian/Muslim" conflict. You can't just go and "replace governments" at will and expect no repercussions. Not That I know what the appropriate response would be, but anger should not be the emotion directing our response, IMHO.

Zeev


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News