SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Amots who wrote (27008)9/12/2001 9:20:13 AM
From: Bosco  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Hi Amots - sorry to interrupt your dialog with Steve, but one way to your quandary [your stmt could be rhetorical, but it doesn't matter]

What if the terrorists put kids in front of them on the way to kill you ?

is to get to them before they can hide behind the kids [or innocent people.]

But of course, the next question is, how? What about civil liberty etc etc if it involve surveillance etc etc. Well, unfortunately, there is no perfect solution to please *everyone*. Maybe one should understand a social contract, within a nation and amongst nations, require some give and take. Ultimately, I think Steve got the right idea that aggressors and victims cut across racial and cultural boundaries. This is not the US against some govt[s] but to protect the innocent from the fanatics

best, Bosco



To: Amots who wrote (27008)9/12/2001 10:06:22 AM
From: Steve Lee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Amots, how the Israeli soldiers have defended or attacked is not the point I am making. It is the reaction from the parents/friends/families of the innocents killed.

The Palestinians are rejoicing in the streets with glee, just as RICH1 and others would happily unleash nuclear terror on untargeted human beings.