Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (426)	9/12/2001 10:17:35 AM
From: SE	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27666

You are wrong. The safety of the President was paramount. They took him where they knew he would be safe until it was certain he could return to Washington.

To: jhild who wrote (426)	9/12/2001 10:34:36 AM
From: joseph krinsky	Respond to of 27666

If you feel that he should have never been in harms way, isn't that what he did by going to where he went? When you say that it is the appearance...Isn't it possible that this is an appearance that is evident to very few people? I haven't read or heard anywhere except from you that "he ran and hid". I think that your assessment of that situation seems to be influenced greatly by your emotions concerning him, and not what is/was the best course of action under the circumstances. IMO had he done what you wished, and had something happened to him, do you not think that things would be much worse than they are? I believe that yesterday they didn't really know what the situation was until much later in the day, and that they took the necessary & proper steps needed at the time.