Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (54660)	9/12/2001 11:55:36 AM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Compare and contrast: seems like a weak evidence. I can go on Amazon and find 100s of books with hypothesis, conspiracy theories, majority of them are false. with I am not sure about the precise strategy for the response to current attack, but IMO, the justice for those involved in previous incidents would be a death penalty applied very widely. Suppose they met at somebody's home where they discussed these actions. Who else was there? Since they didn't come forward to authorities, they are co-conspirators. What about the temple they attended? Did someone say "Death to America"? To me that's an accomplice, because you never know how someone will interpret those words, and apparently, the people interpretted those actions to mean an attempt to murder 50,000 people in WTC . Message 16337590 Your evidentiary standards seem conveniently flexible.