SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (16367)9/12/2001 12:26:18 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480
 
Seems one would have to have someone to declare war on, no?



To: DMaA who wrote (16367)9/12/2001 2:07:16 PM
From: CVJ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480
 
You edited the word "TODAY" from the crawl I saw on Fox.

WHITE HOUSE WON'T SEEK DECLARATION OF WAR TODAY.

Another crawl mentioned insurance co's potential liabilities of $20 billion. Every insurance policy I've seen covering life or property has a disclaimer to the effect, "... except in case of acts of war, declared or undeclared." They may end up getting off the hook for the damages because of the terrorism.

Chas



To: DMaA who wrote (16367)9/12/2001 3:10:50 PM
From: John Lacelle  Respond to of 59480
 
DMA,

If we declared war, wouldn't we have to abide by the Geneva Convention
when we retaliate? ; * )

I pity those camel jockies 'cause they are about to get hit hard.

-John



To: DMaA who wrote (16367)9/13/2001 12:20:21 AM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480
 
Hi DMA; Article on "Declaration of War, One For the History Books?" see #reply-16342624

-- Carl


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News