Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George Papadopoulos who wrote (507)	9/12/2001 1:10:41 PM
From: Lola	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27666

It's obvious you really have no idea how the mind of a terrorist works and what increases terrorism and what decreases terrorism. I hope for your sake, you never have to personally deal with a terrorist ... you would not fare well. Lola:)

To: George Papadopoulos who wrote (507)	9/12/2001 1:19:07 PM
From: Qone0	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27666

Ok, how many nuclear bombs do you suggest dropping? Where do you drop them? Will it stop terrorism attacks? (IMHO absolutely not), will it increase terrorism? (IMHO absolutely yes). I suggest dropping no nukes. Nice spin attempt though..lol.. I suggest that terrorism cells are snakes. And you attack a snake by going after it head (the leaders that are well known BTW) not the tail(the brain washed followers) You take out the head and the tail can`t function.

To: George Papadopoulos who wrote (507)	9/12/2001 1:19:13 PM
From: JSB	Respond to of 27666

I don't think nukes are necessary, but, and this is critical, we didn't take the high road against Khadfi, we bombed him everytime he screwed with us. We didn't kill him, though we tried, but we did kill a few of his family. In the end, he stopped because he knew every time he stepped up to the plate, we were going bomb the sh*t out of him. If we attempt to take out the Taliban, we have to remember that the Russians tried and gave up and the British couldn't do it 100 years ago, either. That said, it is necessary to terminate the Taliban, by whatever means possible.