SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : An Eye for an Eye -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich1 who wrote (96)9/12/2001 3:54:43 PM
From: thestockrider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 505
 
I'm not sure what Truman would have done. I do know he deliberated for a long time before dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Perhaps the second one wasn't needed, but it did underscore US resolve.

I think their is a much less support for the leadership in Afghanistan now than there was in 1945 Japan. I don't think everyone in Kabul is rooting for the Taleban.



To: Rich1 who wrote (96)9/12/2001 11:49:06 PM
From: LTK007  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 505
 
Truman is not proud of what he did---it was estimated that if he did not do what he did,2million more allied soldiers would die to get a surrender.
The war already ,for us,was 4 years old,and the enemy would never surrender.
But you wimps,don't want any war,you just want to have a Nuclear Blast you can watch on your T.V. sets and then think how fuuuking brave you are--dirty cowards!!!!!Max


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News