Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (715)	9/12/2001 5:29:13 PM
From: Lola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27666

They're obviously protecting him ... they are fools.

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (715)	9/12/2001 6:32:58 PM
From: Lola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27666

I think when they catch him they should put him in a room alone with Hillary for 30 minutes and broadcast it to the world. I think she could get us all a little satisfaction. No weapons, just him and Hillary. Lola:)

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (715)	9/12/2001 7:48:18 PM
From: George Papadopoulos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27666

>If they want to try to avert repercussions, they can extradite bin Laden immediately. I notice they're on a first-name basis with him. Give them an ultimatum to return him or lead to credible information of where he is. If not, they suffer the consequences. What will those consequences be? Bomb Kabul or flatten it as some suggest? Do you think these guys give a sh*t what happens to innocent Afgans? They 'll be in a bunker probably doing some heroin or reading the Koran or something. Instead we'll end up killing thousands of innocent civilians, flatten the already inadequate economy they have, more famine, and then when the bombs stop the survivors will be the best suicide bomber recruiters for more of these snake heads, not just in Afganistan but all the Muslim world. Of course assuming Bin Crapen was responsible.