SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike M2 who wrote (121505)9/13/2001 9:41:40 AM
From: Moominoid  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
I was just commenting on all the calls on these boards for nuclear attacks on Afghanistan.



To: Mike M2 who wrote (121505)9/13/2001 9:43:11 AM
From: oldirtybastard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
the scary part mike is I wonder if they in the other countries know that there are Americans that would rather see their own children die than to hang the weight of that threat on any country that hints at such action. having that info is certainly a tactical advantage and why we are seen as "weak". Our country wants your nationalism to preserve the governemtns power over you, but under no circumstances whatsoever is it acceptable to place more value on American life or borders than foreign ones, that's just not humanitarian.



To: Mike M2 who wrote (121505)9/13/2001 11:13:15 AM
From: S. maltophilia  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
<<suitcase nukes are
scary>>
And so can be tracing the perpetrator of it. This is an old concept. I remember reading a Reader's Digest (!) article around 1966 that talked about a similar situation with China framing Russia.