Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Horgad who wrote (121539)	9/13/2001 12:31:03 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 436258

Mark my words, legal claims stemming from this will be tied up in court at least another 20 years. And the NY civil courts were never that quick to begin with...

To: Horgad who wrote (121539)	9/13/2001 4:39:56 PM
From: James F. Hopkins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Thanx Horgan; I and was wondering why the top falling would take down the entire building, but the way you explained it I got the picture, most of the top fell down through the bottom part and that created enough pressure outward that the whole building collapsed until there was enough rubble at the bottom to support what little was left. --------------------- Originally they said these were built to withstand an impact from a plane crashing into them, seems that was a gross over statement. Jim