Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (13368)	9/13/2001 11:18:33 AM
From: AllansAlias	Respond to of 209892

Thanks Mike. That is such a fine piece. (If some of you skipped over it, here's the link: theage.com.au

To: marginmike who wrote (13368)	9/13/2001 11:46:29 AM
From: Clappy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

he says it a litlle better then I This guy does too: drudgereport.com This is not going to be one of those simple button pressing wars...

To: marginmike who wrote (13368)	9/13/2001 1:34:12 PM
From: sandeep	Respond to of 209892

I disagree completely with this idea of WW III. The problem with this idea is that the enemy (the terrorists) are very few in numbers. Almost all significant nations want to be at peace and pursue prosperity, US style. The earlier world wars involved mighty enemies. This enemy is cowardly and laughable. We should just squash any of these idiotic terrorists once and for all. I doubt it will take more than a year if we have the guts to do it... EDIT: Just hold the countries harboring these guys responsible. Don't get fooled by countries like Pakistan, Libya etc. The war will be won rather quickly...