Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (13380)	9/13/2001 12:07:24 PM
From: Gut Trader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

I've heard lotsa passive-aggressive remarks on the news inferring he (43) was a chicken for going to strategic command. Wife thinks if they keep it up they will have they cables and satellites unplugged.

To: AllansAlias who wrote (13380)	9/13/2001 12:35:42 PM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 209892

He echoes some of my points before. I agree in one respect that the USA must make a point, and its going to require a ground war and occupation. My guess is we go and take Iraq again, and this time we stay to protect are interests and secure are oil supply. If needed we may have to go through Jordan to get there, so be it. On the other hand the USA has a history has of being ill-prepared for coming wars. In almost every case including WWI, WWII The Usa was ill prepared for what was to come. The speed and ability to emerge into a Military industrial complex from a Peace time economy is what is unique about the USA. In many ways ancient Athens was similear. In peace a bountifull society and in war a deadly machine. The fact is we need to start the switch back to the war machine. I dont think America realizes that this is an inevitability, and will be the cost of what is to come. As I have said before I am still surprised the reserves have not been called up. If Bush thinks a bombing campaghn is adequate he has another thing coming.

To: AllansAlias who wrote (13380)	9/13/2001 12:54:30 PM
From: Self-Retired	Respond to of 209892

This kind of a provocation those who did The Attack should like very very much. All this hysteria could destroy much more then The Attack itself. The man who wrote this hates and despises all women in the way that muslims do.

To: AllansAlias who wrote (13380)	9/13/2001 1:10:25 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

HO HO HO! Fred's allright by me! 12) The only way we could save any dignity and respect in the world be to hit back so hard as to make teeth rattle around the world. A good approach would be to have NSA fabricate intercepts proving that Libya was responsible, mobilize nationally, invade, and make Libya permanently a US colony. Most Arab countries are militarily helpless, and that is the only kind our forces could defeat. Doing this, doing anything other than whimpering, would require that ancient military virtue known as "balls." Does Katie Couric have them? Last time I checked, no!

To: AllansAlias who wrote (13380)	9/13/2001 1:32:11 PM
From: Rambi	Respond to of 209892

Hi Allen, Gee, I know lots of angry women! If this guy had any decent points, he lost his ability to communicate with or convince at least the female half of his audience (and one would hope lost some of the male half as well) with his misogynistic and hatefilled language. Of course, he won't care about my opinion because he seems to grant women about as much status as the worst fundamentalist Muslims do. The man has serious problems. He also needs a new wardrobe. Hope you are all well- it has been a terrible week.