SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech News -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (1122)9/13/2001 2:07:38 PM
From: Ian@SI  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 7143
 
Richard,

First, I apologize for another OT post here.

Second, I believe it's futile to try to sensibly explain this most horrible, most evil atrocity. Calling it an irrational act out of hatred somehow seems woefully inadequate.

Nonetheless, in part, I suspect that there's an element of brainwashing or ill-founded indoctrination at work. As a child, I grew up during the cold war. Almost everything I heard or read in the news about the Soviets portrayed that entire population as an evil, subhuman race. As I approached adolescence and saw more reality and a little less propaganda, I came to realize that the Soviets were a people with mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, husbands and wives simply trying to make a better life for themselves and their families.

To anyone on Earth who doesn't understand..... try to grasp a basic..... people like Sadaam Hussein (sp?) are evil.

Just as Carlos, the Jackal, was hired to do dirty work on behalf of governments that couldn't allow themselves to be at all associated with the evil deeds performed by Carlos on their behalf, I believe it's probable that Osama bin Laden is the contracted terrorist for some government. Perhaps, even Saddam, who is brainwashing his followers into believing that the US is the Great Satan.

And this brings me back to where I started. Tuesday's evil acts were too horrendous, too irrational and defy any rational explanation by sane, caring human beings who just want to make a better life for themselves and their families.

Best regards,
Ian



To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (1122)9/13/2001 6:57:12 PM
From: The Dodgy Ticker  Respond to of 7143
 
Rick,
This article was posted on another thread, and I think it's excellent.

by Leonard Pitts Jr. of the Miami Herald
<
< We'll go forward from this moment
<
< It's my job to have something to say.
< They pay me to provide words that help make sense of
that which troubles the
< American soul. But in this moment of airless shock when
hot tears sting
< disbelieving eyes, the only thing I can find to say,
the only words that
< seem to fit, must be addressed to the unknown author of
this suffering.
<
< You monster. You beast. You unspeakable #######.
<
< What lesson did you hope to teach us by your coward's
attack on our World
< Trade Center, our Pentagon, us? What was it you hoped
we would learn?
< Whatever it was, please know that you failed.
< Did you want us to respect your cause? You just damned
your cause.
< Did you want to make us fear? You just steeled our
resolve.
< Did you want to tear us apart? You just brought us
together.
<
< Let me tell you about my people. We are a vast and
quarrelsome family, a
< family rent by racial, social, political and class
division, but a family
< nonetheless. We're frivolous, yes, capable of expending
tremendous emotional
< energy on pop cultural minutiae -- a singer's revealing
dress, a ball team's
< misfortune, a cartoon mouse. We're wealthy, too,
spoiled by the ready
< availability of trinkets and material goods, and maybe
because of that, we
< walk through life with a certain sense of blithe
entitlement. We are
< fundamentally decent, though -- peace-loving and
compassionate. We struggle
< to know the right thing and to do it. And we are, the
overwhelming majority
< of us, people of faith, believers in a just and loving
God.
<
< Some people -- you, perhaps -- think that any or all of
this makes us weak.
< You're mistaken. We are not weak. Indeed, we are strong
in ways that cannot
< be measured by arsenals.
<
< IN PAIN
< Yes, we're in pain now. We are in mourning and we are
in shock. We're still
< grappling with the unreality of the awful thing you
did, still working to
< make ourselves understand that this isn't a special
effect from some
< Hollywood blockbuster, isn't the plot development from
a Tom Clancy novel.
< Both in terms of the awful scope of their ambition and
the probable final
< death toll, your attacks are likely to go down as the
worst acts of
< terrorism in the history of the United States and,
probably, the history of
< the world. You've bloodied us as we have never been
bloodied before.
<
< But there's a gulf of difference between making us
bloody and making us
< fall. This is the lesson Japan was taught to its bitter
sorrow the last time
< anyone hit us this hard, the last time anyone brought
us such abrupt and
< monumental pain. When roused, we are righteous in our
outrage, terrible in
< our force. When provoked by this level of barbarism, we
will bear any
< suffering, pay any cost, go to any length, in the
pursuit of justice.
<
< I tell you this without fear of contradiction. I know
my people, as you, I
< think, do not. What I know reassures me. It also causes
me to tremble with
< dread of the future.
<
< In the days to come, there will be recrimination and
accusation, fingers
< pointing to determine whose failure allowed this to
happen and what can be
< done to prevent it from happening again. There will be
heightened security,
< misguided talk of revoking basic freedoms. We'll go
forward from this moment
< sobered, chastened, sad. But determined, too.
Unimaginably determined.
<
< THE STEEL IN US
< You see, the steel in us is not always readily
apparent. That aspect of our
< character is seldom understood by people who don't know
us well. On this
< day, the family's bickering is put on hold.
<
< As Americans we will weep, as Americans we will mourn,
and as Americans, we
< will rise in defense of all that we cherish.
<
< So I ask again: What was it you hoped to teach us? It
occurs to me that
< maybe you just wanted us to know the depths of your
hatred. If that's the
< case, consider the message received. And take this
message in exchange: You
< don't know my people. You don't know what we're capable
of. You don't know
< what you just started.
<
< But you're about to learn.