Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Poet who wrote (26968)	9/13/2001 3:04:08 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

We have all been upset by the events of the last few days. Kiss Kiss is not moderated by the Supreme Court, it is moderated by me- so the decisions of who gets bounced are justifiably perceived as personal and coming from me- they aren't angry decisions, but I am sure some people perceive them that way (although I will admit to being annoyed occasionally). Let me just say again, that I try not to have any insults posted there or posts dragged from other forums to be insulting, and the partisan slamming seems to be very minimal. If Kiss Kiss is perceived as hostile to anything or anyone, that is not my intent. I have to go to school and have lunch with my son now. No one will eat with him and he is lonely- so I go and eat with him.

To: Poet who wrote (26968)	9/13/2001 3:09:04 PM
From: X Y Zebra	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

You were rude and personalizing your anger. I had asked you to stop and you snapped at me as well. As far I'm concerned, X did the right thing in moderating you off. Not that you're asking me, but since you and I have been friends and I have repeatedly asked you cool it in PM, I'm telling you publicly that I think you're misdirecting your fear and anger about the attack onto X. I don't like it. Please stop. Wrong. 1. I did not asked you. This is not rude, since I want to know her response, not yours, I already learned yours. I am sure she will be quite capable of pointing out whatever she may deem necessary to me. 2. If you consider my 2 responses, to your 2 PM's (i.e. not "repeatedly", just twice), a "snapped back", so be it there is nothing I can do about that, I already told you so. 3. There is no need to repeat to me that you agree with "X" I already knew of your thoughts, since you told me twice. 4. I am NOT misdirecting my "fear and anger" at "X" or anybody else for that matter. I expressed specific opinions, they are all there for you and all to see. "X" chose to respond to them and clearly, misunderstood me and in on or two posts, misrepresented what I said. 5. I told you already, I have no fear, so I cannot "misdirect" what I do not have. As for anger, (read # 4) 6. An attack ? I am not attacking "X" nor anybody else for that matter. I told you, I posted opinions, she answered, I responded. 7. The fact that you say that a specific thing is "abc" does not mean it is so. It may be your representation of it, yet it does not necessarily is so. 8. I know you do not like it, you told me that already 3 times, and I acknowledged it. However, that does not mean that I have to accept your views. 9. I will stop when I, and I alone wish so, therefore, I would suggest that you do not interfere in this anymore. Lastly, as I told you in one of the PM (if not both of them), I am not angry at you, nor "X".