SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Anatolia Minerals Development Ltd V.YMC.U -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (279)9/22/2001 10:50:16 AM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 468
 
Worth while "promotional" read on Cukurdere. One glaring error is the market cap is stated in C$. I made the same mistake early on with this. This trades in US$, so market cap is 1.55 times larger (US$13.5 m) than stated here. I wonder if a stock trading in Vancouver in US$ is a problem for investors? Also note we have not received copper and silver assays yet on the last results!

Can anybody confirm this important and rather key statement in this write up. Is there enough existing capacity "nearby" for a deposit of this size? Sulfide processing would produce a lower operating cost, but a HIGHER capex would it not?:
"Producing a bulk sulfide concentrate requires less capital and lower operation costs and allows for a much higher recovery of metals. And there are a number of nearby operating smelters and roasting plants that would love to get these concentrates."

canadianminingnews.com



To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (279)9/22/2001 7:42:57 PM
From: rockerbanger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 468
 
the ore horizions could certianly be continious if some of the hornfelses and marble blocks have been flaulted lower or the intrusive has an irregular contact dept. but with the limited amount of drilling and limited amount of geologic information it is hard to make a sure guess, but the odds are still looking ++ to me.