Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (27000)	9/13/2001 6:18:16 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

In my mind, the terrorists and their network are the enemy. The Taliban is part of that network. I agree fully with this. It appears likely that more than one group was involved. bin Laden's may have been only one. So we take his support out and any another group or nation. And there may have been nations. Saddam and Iraq have been mentioned repeatedly. That IS war. The Taliban rules most of Afghanistan. It appears to me that they do so by force. The Nazis also ruled by force and fear. And the Taliban is the closest thing to a government Afghanistan has. It controls about 90% of the country. And laser precision is impossible in warfare. There is going to be "collateral damage." We should use whatever force is necessary to put a stop to this sort of thing. No more. And no less.