SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (121710)9/13/2001 5:28:16 PM
From: XenaLives  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 436258
 
I heard that where the planes hit showed a knowledge of their construction - too high and not enough metal would melt to bring them down - too low and the structure would have held. - but they got it JUST RIGHT!



To: LLCF who wrote (121710)9/13/2001 5:36:33 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
DAK, the building were planed for an 707 impact. Aside the failure is not of the architects but as i mentioned before Airlines, FAA, Air Control and Air Force ............. procedure ...... rules of action............... not to mention the failure to recognize that we are at war on the political level ......... e.g. Powell

sg.news.yahoo.com



To: LLCF who wrote (121710)9/13/2001 5:55:26 PM
From: James F. Hopkins  Respond to of 436258
 
I'm not saying your wrong, perhaps someone should
have known,
but that the collaps was not something "I" would have
forseen and I wouldn't have feared the heat.
( as long as I hade a charged up hose close by.)
Too many firemen were lost for them to have
suspected the type of collapse they had.

Jim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News