Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bosco who wrote (27340)	9/14/2001 1:07:39 PM
From: Bruce A. Thompson	Respond to of 30051

Bosco, Thank you for agreeing to disagree. H#LL, I could be wrong. I wouldn't hold any other nation's programmers responsible for their actions taken outside of the borders of this country. I would, however hold any American person or company directly responsible for the actions of the enemy who, within our own borders, uses American tech to secure their comm's. Any American who develops anything that aids the enemy should provide our country with the very best offsets they can devise. Other country's citizens have to set and abide by their own rules. Such rules as providing safe harbor to the enemy could (and should) result in retribution by the "Winner" of the war to come. I, being a Vietnam Veteran, find it very difficult to watch our country descend into the political bickering over the "rules" of this coming war. We have an extremely competent, experienced group of leaders. Lets give them the mission and then back the H#LL out of their way. The #1 rule in in the coming war should be F^ck fair, WIN! But what do I know, BT