SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Son of SAN - Storage Networking Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Douglas Nordgren who wrote (4009)9/15/2001 4:59:01 PM
From: pprobinson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4808
 
SANs Plans Canned? Maybe not.Corporations Rush to Secure Data;
Finding Techies Becomes Key Step
By Dennis K. Berman and Calmetta Coleman
Staff Reporters of The Wall Street Journal
While still trying to tally the human toll of the terrorist attack on Manhattan, area businesses are now turning to another kind of rescue effort: saving the corporate and financial data that is the lifeblood of the now-stalled information economy.

Much of that data is retrievable, particularly among the largest and most sophisticated corporations, according to executives who head some of the nation's largest data-backup firms. But they remained cautious about a quick or total recovery.

The hardest part, they said, is the human element: coordinating scattered programmers, system administrators and executives who keep companies and their computer networks running.

"The vast majority of our clients have multiple copies of data on-site and off-site," said Jim Simmons, chief executive of SunGard Business Continuity and Internet Services, a unit of SunGard Data Systems Inc. in Wayne, Pa. Mr. Simmons said the company had 68 customers affected by Tuesday's attack, and 14 of those customers have declared companywide disasters and enacted their disaster-recovery plans.

EMC Corp., one of the nation's largest providers of data backup, said it had about 25 customers with equipment in the World Trade Center complex itself, with another half dozen clients in the immediate area.

Nearly all large corporations maintain data-backup systems separate from a Manhattan location. Based around the country in places such as Iowa, Texas, and Florida, they typically "mirror" a company's databases, providing a copy of the firm's electronic movements.

But a company may not choose to back up all of its systems, choosing, for instance, to archive multiple copies of financial transactions but have a less vigorous standard for corporate e-mail or other communications systems. Executives at the data-storage firms said most clients in lower Manhattan are still in the assessment phase, trying to figure out what they had only on the premises and what and how was being backed up.

Bill Miller, chief technology officer for Storage Networks Inc. in Waltham, Mass., said he had felt secure about the recoverability of financial data used in the world's markets. "For things directly involved in the markets, my level of confidence is high," he said. He noted, however, that a disaster of this scope is not something for which his clients were ever prepared. "This is a case where you can recover some portions remotely, but you have no place to go back to work."

Recovery efforts have been hampered by the inability of workers to return to lower Manhattan, said Sanjay Kumar, chief executive of Computer Associates Inc. Some of the data used to run the nation's businesses are stored informally on employees' personal computers. "They are the least backed-up devices," said Mr. Kumar. "And most of our customers are not planning on showing up downtown for another two weeks."

All of which is making the data-recovery effort as much a human operation as a technical one. Though the financial data may be secure, the established social and business processes that make companies function have been disrupted. "The real issue is, 'Where do these people go to work?' " Mr. Kumar said. Last night, for instance, the company bussed 40 network-design specialists from Atlanta to the Computer Associates headquarters in Islandia, N.Y.

Comdisco Inc., a Rosemont, Ill.-based company that has been in the disaster-recovery business for 20 years, provides facilities where corporate clients can go to use telephones, computers and other equipment to recover electronic data following a disaster. The company said it received calls from about 35 clients as a result of the World Trade Center devastation. Most were WTC tenants, and a few were from nearby buildings that were evacuated. Wednesday, about 30 already were in Comdisco facilities beginning recovery of their data.

"For a number of our customers, they've been able to move into our buildings and restore their operations today," said John Jackson, head of Comdisco's Availability Solutions business, which includes disaster recovery.

Comdisco declined to name specific clients without their permission, but most are banks, insurance firms and other financial-services companies. Mr. Jackson said one of those affected by the terrorist attack was a trade exchange.

Comdisco operates 45 disaster recovery centers world-wide, including 23 in North America. Those being used as a result of Tuesday's devastation include a trading-floor recovery center in Queens, two facilities in northern New Jersey, two in Chicago, and one each in Minneapolis, Atlanta, San Francisco, Boston and Columbia, Maryland. The recovery centers are deliberately spread out geographically, partly to facilitate contingency plans in case Comdisco itself were struck by disaster.

Most clients back up their own data, store it in remote locations and bring it to Comdisco facilities when it needs to be recovered. In other cases, Comdisco actually makes electronic duplicates of a client's important data -- which could include customer account transactions and other account information. Many companies work on a cycle that would have called for backing up data on Monday, which means they would have lost very little, Mr. Jackson said.

Write to Dennis K. Berman at dennis.berman@wsj.com and Calmetta Coleman at calmetta.coleman@wsj.com



To: Douglas Nordgren who wrote (4009)9/20/2001 4:45:31 PM
From: Gus  Respond to of 4808
 
Hitachi storage claims under question
13:29 Tuesday 18th September 2001
computerwire.com

HDS storage arrays sold by HP and Sun may only give half the performance claimed for them, according to an analyst firm

Analyst firm the Robert Frances Group (RFG) is adamant that Hitachi Data Systems is overstating the ability of its Lightning storage array - despite the vendor's insistence that it has done no such thing.

At issue is the data throughput of HDS' Lightning 9900 storage array, which is resold and re-badged by Hewlett-Packard and Sun Microsystems. RFG has issued a report which says the usable data throughput of the array is just 1.6GB per second, half the 3.2GB per second which HDS insists its hardware can deliver.

Both sides stood by their claims this week when contacted by ComputerWire. At the heart of the dispute is the data throughput of the four cache-memory boards fitted to a fully-loaded Lightning 9900. RFG points out that these are the gating factor. Each board is capable of up to 500MB per second throughput, and in total they provide 2GB per second total throughput. Overheads will reduce that figure by 100MB per second, reducing the total number to 1.6GB per second.

HDS, however, says the boards can handle 800MB. Senior analyst Ed Broderick says this was the stance taken by HDS earlier this year when he was researching the report. "They did some combination of the Mexican Hat Dance, the French Waltz and the Argentinian Tango. For the cache throughput I was told 400, 500, 600, 800MB per second -- 1.2, 1.4 and even 1.6GB per second. So we were into 'let's pick a number here' territory," he said.

"Let's be charitable and call it 600MB per second - which puts HDS in the range of IBM. All the vendors are close in performance terms. The benchmarks can be manipulated, and the thing you can really trust is what you see in your own shop," Broderick said.

news.zdnet.co.uk