Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (27333)	9/15/2001 12:18:38 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

I'd suggested a special weapon, powered by CO2, with multi-shot Taser darts. It's surprising how compliant people can become they are doing the 40kV Watusi!

To: Solon who wrote (27333)	9/15/2001 3:11:54 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Oh, and also, a weapon mounted on the back of the cockpit whose exit is camouflaged from the passenger side and which may be aimed with computerized assistence so as to kill the target. This could be connected through remote control to one or more other such camouflaged weapons such that even were the perp to be holding a hostage in front of his body--his back would stiill be exposed to a computer aimed shot. edit: again, there would need to be a sharing of code in order to "turn on" the mechanisms of lethal capacity. The most important safeguard, if any precautions are to be meaningful, is that the cockpit be controlled from the inside--electronically and manually--and that NO access from other than staff members, may EVER be allowed regardless of the threat.