Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mr. Pink's Picks: selected event-driven value investments -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dr. Voodoo who wrote (15880)	9/15/2001 2:17:44 PM
From: RockyBalboa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18998

That is not the question here, V. The point is that most civilised states expressly pledged to support measures taken by the U.S (either by granting military support, territorial rights, information or at least not hindering preparations...), most prominently states within the North Atlantic pact, but also Russia and China while at the same time none of those countries started their own fighting, regardless whether believe to "support" the matter of the U.S. or not. The United States have been attacked and therefore must have the ultimate decision about counter measures and not a third country with little to no involvement. What do you think happened if every little community started their own battle with neighbours on the basis that they "could" have something to do with the attacks?