Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: darra who wrote (9361)	9/15/2001 7:14:21 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

Hi darra, news.xinhuanet.com Chugs, Jay

To: darra who wrote (9361)	9/15/2001 7:21:14 PM
From: Cal Gary	Respond to of 74559

Along the same vein, check this out: Message 16357348

To: darra who wrote (9361)	9/15/2001 8:51:54 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Respond to of 74559

darra, as Jay says, that's not food for thought. China's rulers and all the way down to the bottom of the heap want stability, prosperity, peace and power. They won't get that by allowing anyone to attack the WTC buildings and Pentagon. <New evidence that has been left at the CIA suggests that the Chinese not only knew, but also encouraged, and now is arming the Afghanistan people. Eight hours after the fatal terrorist attack, the CIA got word from a inside source in Beijing that the Communist leaders knew 6 months in advance of the attack, but did nothing as hard-liners inside the government wanted this attack to take place.> Jay was closer to the correct theory but not quite there. I can't actually tell you the truth of the cause, [I'm sworn to secrecy], but you will find an old Kiwi guy in Eketahuna, who immigrated from China before the Japanese arrived, [which has recently suffered some unfortunate and unexplained fires] who is the mastermind behind the whole drama. Mqurice PS: This is starting to sound like the shot heard around the world which kicked off WWI. A successful plot and attack led to positioning of the political powers and away it went into mayhem. I guess my figure of speech for USS Enterprise representing the US economy, financial institutions, political, legislative, military system is now under test as the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise is positioned ready for instructions.

To: darra who wrote (9361)	9/15/2001 9:33:34 PM
From: tradermike_1999	Respond to of 74559

Indian national news site says a small US force has landed in Pakistan: news.sify.com US marines land in Pakistan: report Islamabad, Sep 15 US troops landed at Islamabad International Airport on Friday morning, two Pakistani dalies reported. According to unofficial reports, a contingent of over 50 personnel from the Special Services Group of the US Marines' Green Seals have landed for conducting 'target oriented' operations against Bin Laden, prime suspect in the terrorist strikes in the US. A military plane brought the US troops to Islamabad, who were then taken to an unknown place. Islamabad Airport remained closed from 3 to 5am on Friday morning-- which according to the eyewitness account was the time of arrival of US troops. A senior official told The News that "some kind of a military exercise" was going on at the time of the closure of the airport. "There is a normal schedule of such type of exercises, and one should not worry about it," said the senior official. The Nation daily on Saturday reported that a special plane carrying over two dozen foreigners landed at the Chakala airbase in early Friday.

To: darra who wrote (9361)	9/16/2001 4:12:58 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Respond to of 74559

hi darra, I see no future for China by participating in this type of venture. Even from a purely selfish standpoint it is in China's best interest to have a safe and vibrant US. regards Kastel

To: darra who wrote (9361)	9/16/2001 11:05:47 AM
From: carranza2	Respond to of 74559

Certainly food for thought here Junk food for thought. The report is sensationalsitic. Should be discounted. National Enquirer probably has more journalistic integrity.