Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lbs1989 who wrote (76617)	9/16/2001 6:53:07 AM
From: IngotWeTrust	Respond to of 116752

<edited: see next post>

To: lbs1989 who wrote (76617)	9/16/2001 6:53:08 AM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116752

You bet your rabbinical wannebe asp I'm "agitated." You want to know why you particularly draw it out of me? Because you could NOT answer 2 questions put directly to you, one simple and one "essay." I'm calling you out: are you trying to assign blame to Jews, regardless of Noah's lineage for the World Trade Center Bombing. This Q. demonstrated my good-faith invitation/willingness to listen and dialog with you. You've blatantly refused, revealing for me and others that you want control of the dialog, instead of seeking genuine participation IN a dialog. I reject your patriarchial, rabbinical wannabe, argumentative entrapment. The difference in communication styles, as you very well know is this: TRUE DIALOG takes place when assumed equality exists between participants. That is a posture you are unwilling to grant me. In that arena, diffferent levels of information permits actual conversation to occur. Then, both "take away" something from the discussion. Your preferred "style" if you please is to parade some basic but archane piece of knowledge, thereby requiring acquiescence to your patriarchal superiority from a hierarchy model, something I'm not willing to grant you, at least until you declare your motivation and I have an opportunity to consider its genuineness and evaluate your "positional posturing." If you can't answer a yes/no question, then you're as useless as tits on a boar hog when it comes to affirmative meaningful dialog. There is a motivation behind your wanting to "discuss" Jewish bloodline, most especially the Semitic or as you spell it "Shemetic" with me in regard to this WTC bombing. For those less aware of the etimology of your S vs A and which one is right, let me distill the "S" for those reading so far: Webster distills and parses the definition of Semitic thusly: "a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs* b : a descendant of these peoples"* They can look up Askenazi for themselves. People who cannot say, Yay or Nay such as you are conducting yourself, do NOT wish to discuss: you wish to persuade, to engage, to distract, to "'yes, but" into tiresome oblivion. For those reading this interaction I wish to interject here that you are trying to draw me into the endless argumentative style whereby you as a rabbi or "rabbinical wannabe" conduct your own particular brand of catechism with pre-determined results and proseltyzing. Homie don't play in your ballpark. Just for the helluvit, how do you rationalize/assign lineage to the third branch of Judiasm currently acknowledged today? Oh, but why do I bother...you've already demonstrated copiously that you only ask questions, you never answer them. I have no use for pseudo-intellectual, self-assigned rabbinical egoists positors. Especially when USA is at war with your Islamic a&&. You're disgusting!