Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James1000 who wrote (3136)	9/16/2001 8:14:47 AM
From: bela_ghoulashi	Respond to of 27666

Boy, do yourself a favor and actually read a little of your research before you use it: foolbrain.com Unless the whole idea is to look like you don't know what you're talking about.

To: James1000 who wrote (3136)	9/16/2001 8:36:01 AM
From: SirRealist	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27666

I believe more than a few have acknowledged US government culpability for the violent choices it has made. As long as you wish to discuss uranium poisoning, why not start with American Indians being so treated? I don't think your report would add much that most here don't know. Certainly, we are not capable of changing the past. We'd like to change the future. So what is the point of proving our government has participated in acts of violence? That we should stop? Or what? How would you protect the world from Saddam Hussein's brutality? Should we pull all support from Israel amid a host of Arab nations committed to its extermination? Do you say the sufferings caused by us warrant the response delivered last Tuesday?

To: James1000 who wrote (3136)	9/16/2001 8:36:01 AM
From: SirRealist	Respond to of 27666

I believe more than a few have acknowledged US government culpability for the violent choices it has made. As long as you wish to discuss uranium poisoning, why not start with American Indians being so treated? I don't think your report would add much that most here don't know. Certainly, we are not capable of changing the past. We'd like to change the future. So what is the point of proving our government has participated in acts of violence? That we should stop? Or what? How would you protect the world from Saddam Hussein's brutality? Should we pull all support from Israel amid a host of Arab nations committed to its extermination? Do you say the sufferings caused by us warrant the response delivered last Tuesday?