SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chalu2 who wrote (3802)9/16/2001 3:20:30 PM
From: Thomas M.  Respond to of 23908
 
It's amazing how empty those links are. Truly amazing. In the first, Chomsky is repeatedly accused of lying, although the accuser repeatedly states that Chomsky did not actually say the things he is lying about. Note that the author has no ability to challenge Chomsky's facts, so he has to resort to innuendo and slander. In the second, Chomsky is attacked for his belief in the free press. I agree with him. You and the Taliban disagree with him.

Tom



To: chalu2 who wrote (3802)9/16/2001 8:34:57 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908
 
Thanks, chalu2. Now I see where Thomas gets his debating style from.



To: chalu2 who wrote (3802)9/17/2001 4:04:34 AM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23908
 
Let's not forget his most famous flop - that there were no Cambodian killing fields, and the Khmer Rouge were a nice bunch of chaps.

To this day, that ass plays that particular harp, against all evidence to the contrary.

Derek


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News