SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JRI who wrote (487)9/17/2001 10:20:55 AM
From: Bosco  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 644
 
Hi all - it is unlikely Pakistan would actually wage war against Afghanstan. Reality is that there is also a sizeable population of dispossessed within its own border. However, just be sealing off the border between the 2 countries will have the effects, militarily and psychologically.

Personally, I think Clark's concerns are a prudent look at history, even though this is quite unprecedented. I mean, this is a rare moment in time when the US has contemplated to accept any goodwill gesture from both Russia and Iran! While Amr Moussa of the Arab League seems to backpedal a bit, the Talibans and Saddam Hussein are very isolated now. So, to justify my personal bias against any full scale war, I think it is a matter of striking at the heart of terrorism, even if it may take longer time to achieve the goal. If it must, the US should concentrate on Kandahar. One doesn't remove the cancer by killing the whole body.

best, Bosco



To: JRI who wrote (487)9/17/2001 10:54:51 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 644
 
JRI, They definitely did not try to hold the borders. And they never won any standup battles with the Russians. They just hit them so often that they never saw an end, much like our experience in Vietnam.