Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (55294)	9/17/2001 10:38:21 AM
From: SouthFloridaGuy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

<<laying off people>> <<cutting routes>> <<war>> All factored in the stock price. The first 2 are actually positives which will help shore up profitability. I know I sound cold-hearted, but the things you mention are dreams for investors - you buy when things are bleakest and everybody is negative. Just like I would never buy CSCO until this board becomes negative and starts spewing out how bad CSCO is, I use the same methodology for the airline stocks. Nobody wants airline stocks, therefore the invetment is attractive for me because the collective majority is NEVER right in the stock market.

To: RetiredNow who wrote (55294)	10/2/2001 3:06:56 PM
From: SouthFloridaGuy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

Mindmeld, while my individual stock call wasn't correct, my philosophy on airline sector was. I remember you told me that your sister works for AMR. Check out AMR stock - it's up STRONG today and it even seems to be breaking out to fill the gap. The bottom was made on the Monday after the attacks and confirmed several days after. IMHO. <<<Nobody wants airline stocks, therefore the invetment is attractive for me because the collective majority is NEVER right in the stock market.>>>