SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41936)9/17/2001 2:07:43 PM
From: Murrey Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
<- eventually leading to a nuclear strike on NYCity>

Jim...a nuke is dependant upon a delivery system:
1. Aircraft dropping a bomb (al la Hiroshima).
2. An artillery shell (would have to be in close proximity and yield would be very low).
3. A missile or rocket capable of delivery from an extremely long distance.

Undeniably, we have enemies who have nuclear devices. Numbers one and two, because of what has happened, are unlikely. Number three pretty much rules out all but the largest military powers. I think nuclear warfare on the mainland for the above reasons is unlikely.

I am concerned, however, with the biological aspect. A cup full of some nasty bugs can be easily concealed and deliver a lot of misery.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41936)9/17/2001 2:20:53 PM
From: Voltaire  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
YEP,

after all Hitler has only bombed and invaded Poland. We sure do not want to upset the people that support him, no no, that might bring on some kind of catastrophe. This is where people missed the point then and NOW - The day will come when we'll look back at what could have been a relatively small conflagration instead of the destruction of civilization as we know it.

But hell, what do I know - I still hold RMBS.

Now will someone dressed in a very Romantic Uniform nod to the band to begin playing once again.

selah,

V