SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Sharck Soup -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wes Stevens who wrote (35659)9/18/2001 10:22:31 AM
From: Dr. Voodoo  Respond to of 37746
 
They do not react fast enough. It will be up to the military on the cdc to save our tails.

They have reacted, to save your tail. They funded biotechs to get busy on this back in 1997. You also asked why anyone would work to create these type of drugs when their was no market. I answered that question.

I think I understand the gist of what you are saying; but the problem is more complicated than just a list of biological agents. All that I will say is, nothing you have mentioned so far hasn't already been addressed, targeted and funded many years ago.

The second point I would like to make to all is that this problem isn't going to go away after we bomb the hell out of afganistan. This is a long term problem. Out of long term problems have come fantastic scientific discovery.

Nobody on earth would have funded our space program either. Yet look at what we have gotten from it.

JMO



To: Wes Stevens who wrote (35659)9/18/2001 10:42:38 AM
From: Frederick Langford  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37746
 
Wes,

Internet stocks didn't make money either, it is the perception that they will be in the forefront for biological warfare solutions. I predict that Biotechs will be the next generation 'internet stocks'

Fred