SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DOUG H who wrote (183644)9/18/2001 11:50:55 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Tom Clancy: Don't Blame the CIA

Ace thriller novelist Tom Clancy, in a piece today titled "How We
Got Here," says, "First we crippled the CIA. Then we blamed it."

Among his observations:

"The general aim of terrorism is to force changes in the targeted
society through the shock value of the crime committed. Therefore,
if we make radical changes in how our country operates, the bad
guys win. We do not want that to happen. Whoever planned this
operation is watching us right now, and they are probably having a
pretty good laugh. We can't stop that. What we can do is to
maintain that which they most hate, which is a free society."

"As recently as two weeks ago, CBS's '60 Minutes' regaled us with
the hoary old chestnut about how the CIA undermined the leftist
government of Chile three decades ago. The effect of this media
coverage, always solicitous to leftist governments, is to brand the
CIA an antiprogressive agency that does Bad Things.

"In fact, the CIA is a government agency, subject to the political
whims of whoever sits in the White House and Congress. ...

"The Chilean event and others (for example, attempts to remove
Fidel Castro from the land of the living, undertaken during the
presidency of JFK, rather more rarely reported because only good
came from Camelot) caused the late Sen. Frank Church to help gut
the CIA's Directorate of Operations in the 1970s. What he
carelessly left undisturbed then fell afoul of the Carter
administration's hit man, Stansfield Turner. That capability has
never been replaced.

"It is a lamentably common practice in Washington and elsewhere to
shoot people in the back and then complain when they fail to win
the race. The loss of so many lives in New York and Washington is
now called an 'intelligence failure,' mostly by those who crippled
the CIA in the first place, and by those who celebrated the loss of
its invaluable capabilities. What a pity that they cannot stand up
like adults now and say: 'See, we gutted our intelligence agencies
because we don't much like them, and now we can bury thousands of
American citizens as an indirect result.'"
newsmax.com

tom watson tosiwmee



To: DOUG H who wrote (183644)9/19/2001 12:15:39 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 769670
 
Well richie did call himself a traitor.
Message 16376163
To:rich4eagle who wrote (183569) From: rich4eagle
You called me a traitor, please apologize

And I asked
Well richie thinks he is a traitor. I wonder if he has any other words to sum up what he really is.http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=16376283

And richie responded with one word. coward
Message 16376304

I asked richie again.
What it is you consider yourself.
Message 16376315
He responded. coward
Message 16376336

A third time I asked richie
Richie you call youself a traitor. Do you have any other words that sum up who you are.
Message 16376286

And richie answered. coward
Message 16376296

If richie wants to call himself a cowardly traitor then who am I to argue with him.

tom watson tosiwmee



To: DOUG H who wrote (183644)9/21/2001 12:28:43 AM
From: rich4eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Well, Doug if you did not I am sorry, however, I have been under quite an attack and have been called a traitor by several here, maybe I lumped you, you haven't been very kind either