SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Shread who wrote (19276)9/19/2001 9:05:02 AM
From: faro  Respond to of 52237
 
Taken from the Woodson Wave report:

"...What we want to see for a bottom to this E wave es a huge spike down below the trenline. We want to see a high put/call ratio, over 1. A huge volume day would also be desirable. In summary, a huge move down (below 9106 at a minimum, to 8706 to meet the trendline, and right at 7927 would be perfect), on high volume, with a high put/call ratio -- a capitulation, or throwing in of the towel if you will, would be confirmation that a spike low is in place."

Faro



To: Paul Shread who wrote (19276)9/19/2001 9:05:17 AM
From: JRI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
Softie at 40 could mean COMPX 1000, but certainly COMPX 1348 ('98 low?) at a minimum

Softie at 32 (and change) means COMPX below 1000 IMO...I could see that on a panic, capitulation day..

I see a potential "swing for the fences" event....it is assumed that Taliban/clerics will not give up Bin Laden...but I've read a couple things that makes me think there is more rational thought there then believes (ie. bin Laden is a foreignor, what has he really done for us (?), we've got other, important things to focus on/and don't need battle with U.S. and refugee problem, and....)

Its a long-shot, but if they vote to give up Bin Laden, that could be the sharp 4 catalyst (you pointed out the flat 2 already)...I think the decision comes tomorrow..



To: Paul Shread who wrote (19276)9/19/2001 11:24:15 AM
From: velociraptor_  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 52237
 
4 of 3 could be roughyl the same length in time as 2 of 3, however, you are correct in that 2 of 3 was a flat, so 4 of 3 should be a sharp. This may shorten its duration in time, but I really don't know yet. No targets for 5 of 3 yet, but either a double bottom or slightly lower lows than 3 of 3 would be ideal. We'll see.